« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: Squat Proportions  (Read 3264 times)

Offline Arturo Gómez

  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 271
Re: Squat Proportions
« Reply #32 on: Jul 17, 2011, 03:13 PM »
The other impact was, clearly, the fall of the state sponsorization in socialist countries. I did not analized numbers, but I think that the greatest fall in the records is of countries like Bulgaria, Romenia, Hungary
Logged

Offline Andy Dick

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 779
Re: Squat Proportions
« Reply #33 on: Jul 18, 2011, 08:56 PM »
NOOOOOOO! Not the Smith machine...I CHOOSE DEATH!!!!  Atleast DB Squats instead :P

MODIFICATION/CLARIFICATION...

Quote from: Shaun Le Conte on Jul 17, 2011, 09:24 AM
The history above is a little mixed up. The first change at the beginning of 1993 was a recognition of the impact of steroids on the record books while retaining 10 weight classes. The second in 1998 was to make room for the women who began competing in the Olympics in 2000, decreasing to 8 men's weight classes.

But this is all besides the main point. Squat on brothers, I will watch from the sidelines or the smith machine.
Logged

Offline Matt Erdman

  • Global Moderator
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Squat Proportions
« Reply #34 on: Jul 18, 2011, 09:02 PM »
Quote from: Andy Dick on Jul 18, 2011, 08:56 PM
NOOOOOOO! Not the Smith machine...I CHOOSE DEATH!!!!  Atleast DB Squats instead :P
I think I missed something...
Logged
I haven't spoken to my wife in years. I didn't want to interrupt her. - Rodney Dangerfield
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »