Quote from: David Woodhouse on Oct 21, 2010, 09:46 AMI'm not sure I understand your point. Our training frequency is specifically designed to coincide with the peak in supercompensation. It is specific to 'amateur' lifters of a certain ability (Sinclair less than 320)I believe in the article you quoted a trainer who advised to do the minimal to get a response. I just disagree with using that phrase in a general manner. Reminds me of Prilepin table. Where he had a minimal, optimal and maximal worked out at a given intensity. I'm sure you have worked out the intensity and volume to try and maximize a twice per week frequency.
I'm not sure I understand your point. Our training frequency is specifically designed to coincide with the peak in supercompensation. It is specific to 'amateur' lifters of a certain ability (Sinclair less than 320)