Author Topic: Lunges?  (Read 912 times)

Offline Andy Dick

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Lunges?
« on: Dec 14, 2007, 11:28 AM »
I sent a message a long these same lines to Chris but he hasn't gotten back to me yet :( , So I figured I would post it to see what you all think.

I was reading the other day that Bud Charniga advocated the use of lunges with a foot placement opposite the split jerk foot placement.  This was because the jerks unevenly stressed one side of the body so he used lunges to even out the stresses on the body.  What do you all think about this?  (so for me since I split my right foot forward, I would only do lunges with my left foot going forward)

My other question would be would it be better to just work your regular clean and jerks then, do a few sets of rack jerks with the opposite leg going forward.  After thinking about it this didnt seem as feasable due to the neurological stress and fatigue that would accumulate from doing so many jerks in addition to everything else in the program.  Lunges would be less stress.

Then I was thinking would there be merit to adding in more squat jerks in a program for variation and to have times where this stress is evened out.  Is this the reason why Dimas and Khakisvilis (I probably butchered the spelling) squat jerked all the time?

Andy

Offline Matt Erdman

  • Global Moderator
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Lunges?
« Reply #1 on: Dec 14, 2007, 11:54 AM »
Do one leg squats (assisted if need be) and see if there is a strength difference. Of course your right leg may be stronger in the lunge exercise, but that could just be neurological.  Doing an unfamiliar, unilateral exercise will tell you if there is an actual muscular difference. Remember that both legs are supporting the weight in the jerk.

I wouldn't add an exercise just based on someone elses experience. You have to find out if it is something you really need.
I haven't spoken to my wife in years. I didn't want to interrupt her. - Rodney Dangerfield

Offline Andy Dick

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Lunges?
« Reply #2 on: Dec 14, 2007, 12:17 PM »
I was looking at from the stand point of wear and tear.  Do you know why these other great lifters did squat jerks instead of split?  Was it just that they were better at them or what?

Offline Dave Almeida

  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 163
Re: Lunges?
« Reply #3 on: Dec 14, 2007, 02:34 PM »
It is because they were better at them. Lunges are only useful for deloading the spine. I don't see how an imbalance would be creating from jerking if you are squatting all the time. It's just stabilization with your legs after the drive.

Offline Ryan Marciniszyn

  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
Re: Lunges?
« Reply #4 on: Dec 14, 2007, 04:08 PM »
I would think lunges have more application in correct squat imbalances than jerk imbalances.

Offline Matt Erdman

  • Global Moderator
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Lunges?
« Reply #5 on: Dec 14, 2007, 08:32 PM »
I don't think there would be any particular wear and tear. That's just an issue of injury prevention and general health.
I haven't spoken to my wife in years. I didn't want to interrupt her. - Rodney Dangerfield

Offline Myles Astor

  • Noob
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Lunges?
« Reply #6 on: Dec 16, 2007, 12:41 PM »
I was looking at from the stand point of wear and tear.  Do you know why these other great lifters did squat jerks instead of split?  Was it just that they were better at them or what?


It was my understanding that a lot had to do with leg strength eg. Dimas had really strong legs and used the squat jerk as result.

Myles B. Astor, PhD
Myles B. Astor, PhD
Equinox Fitness Clubs