Author Topic: Good Morning technique  (Read 1009 times)

Offline Tom Phillips

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 25
Good Morning technique
« on: Apr 22, 2007, 02:34 PM »
I just wanted to check my good morning form is ok, i havent done them for quite a while.
They felt a little strange even at this light weight, im not sure about the amount of leg bend i should be allowing and how low i should get?
Also what do you guys/girls recommend in terms of rep range - ive read that good mornings should be done in slightly higher ranges (8-10) but would this apply when training for weight lifting?

Comp P.B's
Snatch 83
CJ 100
Total 180 @ 75

Offline Ryan Marciniszyn

  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
Good Morning technique
« Reply #1 on: Apr 22, 2007, 02:52 PM »
Looks fine now put some weight on the bar

Offline Paul LaDuke

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Good Morning technique
« Reply #2 on: Apr 22, 2007, 07:19 PM »
I would move your feet closer to shoulder width apart, not sure if that really makes that big a difference.  It may put more strain on the hamstrings that way.

The slight knee bend is fine and probably necessary.  

The biggest key to the exercise is to keep a tight arch in your back which you do just fine.  Like Ryan says - add some weight now.

2 variations on this exercise are to perform a good morning rep and then squat a rep.  Variation 2 is to perform a good morning then while bent over bend the knees into a full squat position and then squat the weight back up.

Good video.  Thanks for posting!
Paul LaDuke, MSS, CSCS, ATC, USAW Club Coach
Lower Dauphin School District
Hummelstown, PA

Offline Tom Phillips

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 25
Good Morning technique
« Reply #3 on: Apr 23, 2007, 03:49 AM »
thanks for the input guys
Comp P.B's
Snatch 83
CJ 100
Total 180 @ 75

Offline Don Weideman

  • Site Supporter
  • WE Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 197
  • get a job!
Why are we doing this exercise?
« Reply #4 on: Apr 24, 2007, 01:08 AM »
A little more explosion on the concentric or extention.
To be is to do